Compare the book and the movie of all the kings men Essay

Compare the book and the movie of all the kings men - Essay ExampleMovie had in it not only a strong and finest manakin but a bit of philosophy, narration, great Ameri target prose and most excellent dialogues. Whenever a popular novel is converted into a movie, that too with a b alley star cast the expectations of people with the movie rise and with that it is a popular phenomena that people compare novel and the movie. Where words and the feel of the novel attract ratifiers, wide star cast with great dialogues attracts audience in the cinema. Where the novel All the Kings men is not a linear novel, reader can easily get confused at various points as the nature of the novel is anti-chronological. Time Travelling is an big factor in the novel and it practically confuses the reader regarding realizing which time period they are in (New York Times,2006). The novel start with the frame-up in year 1936 where protagonist, jack up Burden remembering a road trip in the year 1933 to M ason city with Willie Stark, tom Stark who is Willies son and Willies wife Lucy Stark. They talk about political embrace which diddleys mentor Judge Irwin was facing. In the novel the conflict between Jack, Willie holds importance as it is the initial stage of the novel and the readers are in good grip of the characters. The readers can now well judge the shady elements in the characters. Judge Irwin is old so the readers can symthatise with him as well. The question which comes in the minds is why all this is happening because they are good friends and they share such a close relationship, what went wrong. The novel is very impactful at this stage and leaves the reader with a question of why this is happening. Movie captures the scene well too but the words expressed in the novel and the feelings which are expressed are more than effective in the novel compared to the book. Jack goes in the year 1922, there is a lot of time travelling in the novel which sometimes confuses the reader as well. The Film however is set during early 1950s in Louisiana except for the flashbacks, where the well dressed and popular amongst all and also humourous Willie Start is made the governor through the support given to him by the lower social classess.( Movie All the Kings men) His supporters are his bodyguard friend Sugar boy, the journalist Jack Burden, Tiny Duffy and Starks mistress Sadie Burke who will help him against the upper class. Apart from the time setup in the novel and the movie there are some other prominent differences in both as well, from the character development of the Sugar boy who in the book is totally following Willies every move however in the movie he plays a silent bodyguard. (Empire Magazine,2006). Another important factor or the dissimilarity is the character development of Jack. Jacks character in the book is a very complex. He is cynic and absent-minded towards life. Jacks excessive love towards character of Anna Stanton is clearly seen in the book, also Jacks anger in the book is far more impactful when he figured out that Willie has taken Anne as a mistress. The movie however was just partially successful in capturing the emotional side of Jacks character. Particularly, his philosophical discussion in the novel about what he calls The Great Twitch is missing in the film. In keeping with the era of the 1930s, Jack is also fairly racist by standards of a later era, an aspect that is not portrayed in the film. One major setback of the movie was removing Tom Stark